Turkey
was the subject of two separate talks in London last week. One conference in
Whitehall with noted speakers from academia and diplomatic circles covered the
usual ‘wither Turkey and the West’ question
that has been plaguing Western statesmen for several hundred years. It was
interesting to hear the same sort of concerns that must have resonated in the same
halls more than 150 years ago when what was left of the Ottoman Empire was
regarded as something necessary – but not quite what you would bring into the
front parlor.
“However
disagreeable its rulers may be, we cannot afford to let Turkey and the straits fall
into the hands of the Russians. We must continue our efforts to bring Turkey
onside and not let the Russians grab everything.”
Talks in last week’s conference
weren’t much different. “We know that
President Tayyip Erdoğan is difficult to deal with and not quite anyone’s idea
of a real democrat. But we simply must carry on with some sort of dialogue. We
don’t want to wake up one morning and find that the country has jettisoned the
West in favour of Putin.”
True enough. But treating Turkey as
a distant, dyspeptic relative who shows up uninvited for a long weekend in the
Cotswolds obscures the powerful social, political and economic forces driving
the country today. It is those forces, not the temporary rule of Tayyip
Erdoğan, that will determine the future of Turkey. With all the headlines and outbursts surrounding Erdoğan it is sometimes easy to forget that the country is much, much more complex than the bombast of its leader.
The reality of modern Turkey belies the simplistic, one-dimensional
characterization that Erdoğan and many outside observers love. Terms like ally, enemy, religious, secular, democrat,
autocrat have absolutely no meaning by themselves. Turkey can, at the same
time, be one or all of these things. Trends like rising education levels, the
growing middle class, deepening interaction with the global economy, sharp
social and political divisions make it impossible to slot Turkey into a rigid
mold. Anyone who thinks he begins to understand modern Turkey would be well
advised to stop and think again.
It was the internationally-acclaimed
author Elif Şafak who took us beneath the dry diplomatic concerns about Turkey
and offered a clear-eyed, sympathetic view of that reality. The talk at one of
London’s leading bookstores ostensibly was to discuss her most recent novel, Three Daughters of Eve. The book
discusses the lives of three Moslem women – one pious, one hostile to Islam,
and one unsure where she stands on religion -- studying at Oxford.
Elif Şafak |
She also bemoaned the tendency of
Turkey’s current rulers to present the country in simplistic nationalistic,
religious and social terms. The Turkey she described, and one I experienced in
more than two decades in the country, is not the un-differentiated, homogeneous mass that Erdoğan and his acolytes would have people believe. Turkey is in fact
a rich, heterogeneous mixture of people and religion. Yes, most of the people
are Moslem, but there are several shades and varieties of Islam within the
country. Even the subject of nationality is not straightforward. The question
of who, exactly, is a Turk becomes even more complex when you consider the
question of the millions of Turkey’s Kurdish citizens.
While people are proud to call
themselves citizens of the Turkish Republic they are equally quick to point out
their unique family histories. Some are indeed direct descendants of the Turks
who swarmed out of the Altai mountains more than 1,000 years ago. Some of these
families proudly claim direct links to the non-Ottoman tribes that controlled
different parts of Anatolia. Others claim their heritage from the far-flung
regions of the Ottoman Empire: the Balkans, Crete, Yemen, Egypt, mainland Greece.
Many of the villages along the Aegean coast that were vacated during the
population exchange with Greece in the 1920s were re-populated with Turks
driven out of their homes in the Balkans.
Erdoğan also ignores the complex
reality of the modern Turkish economy and how much it is intertwined with the
global economy. Under his mis-management the economy may be sliding fast, but
it remains closely tied to the wider world in critical areas like finance and
trade – including trade in those very basic raw and intermediate materials that
keep Turkish factories working.
Given Erdoğan’s overwhelming control
of almost all political discourse in Turkey today it is revealing that
estimates about the outcome of the referendum giving him total control are as
close as they are. But perhaps the very complexities he ignores in his quest
for this control could result in his unexpected defeat. Even he is learning
that ‘one-size-fits-all’ does not
really apply to Turkey.