Is
Atatürk, the once revered founder and very soul of the modern Turkish Republic,
being relegated to the status of Uncle Buck,
the slightly disreputable distant relative who tends to show up inconveniently
at holidays? This may be a bit of an overstatement, but Turkey’s ruling Justice
and Development party (AKP) is slowly but steadily eroding the iconic
reputation of the man who lifted Turkey out of the chaos of a crumbling,
discredited empire, and dragged it into the modern world.
Ataturk: The Father of Modern Turkey |
His
name used to be considered synonymous with that of the Turkish Republic. Indeed,
the very name Atatürk was bestowed on
him by a grateful parliament, thus changing him from simply Mustafa Kemal to
the everlasting Father Turk. Every
school child had to memorize his famous speeches – especially the one directed
to the youth of Turkey. Huge posters of Atatürk adorned many buildings and his
picture was in almost every office. Several of his memorable sayings would be
emblazoned in neon lights across streets and central squares in every Anatolian
town. Every town had its Atatürk Boulevard and/or Atatürk Square. Anyone who
dared take his name in vain was quickly and viciously sued by zealous state
prosecutors. At the beginning of a new parliament each member had to come
forward and swear an oath to continue the principles of Atatürk and his
revolution.
Now,
under AKP’s steady air-brushing of history, he is in danger of becoming
‘Atatürk who?’. The policy came to a
head last month at what was supposed to be a celebration of the founding of the
Republic on Oct. 29. AKP officials decreed that supporters of Atatürk could not
have a demonstration in front of the old parliament building in Ankara.
Thousands defied that ban and were soaked with water cannons from the police
for their efforts. Police removed the barricades only after the president of
Turkey, Abdullah Gül, intervened.
Police confront pro-Ataturk supporters at Republic Day celebration |
November
10, the day that Atatürk, died in 1938 is another day heavy with symbolism.
Traditionally all traffic stops and sirens start to wail at around 10 am when
he died in Dolmabahçe Palace in Istanbul. This year the prime minister, Tayyip
Erdoğan, conveniently arranged to be out of the country on a ‘crucial’ visit to
the Sultanate of Brunei on November 10. Critics were wondering if Erdoğan was
perhaps getting tips on recreating a ‘sultanate’ in Turkey – under his
leadership, of course.
Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan |
May
19, the day that Atatürk landed in the Black Sea port of Samsun in 1919 to
start the campaign against the Greek invasion, used to be a major celebration
where stadiums were filled with marching school children. No more. Various
excuses were offered last May as to why this once mandatory celebration has
been all but forgotten.
Recently
AKP officials have also suggested that the standard parliamentary oath to
remain faithful to Atatürk’s revolution should be dropped. No one knows what,
if anything, would replace the oath.
And
now a ceremonial procession in the southeastern city of Diyarbakir marking the
75th anniversary of Atatürk’s arrival there has been cancelled for
‘security’ reasons. One person commented that if the Turkish army couldn’t
defend itself who could?
The
trend is obvious, and supporters of Atatürk’s reforms are now derided merely as
Kemalists. Those not familiar with
Turkey today wonder just why the ruling party is going to such lengths to
downgrade a man largely perceived as the saviour of Turkey. The basic reason
seems simple enough. It’s payback time.
Erdoğan and his more zealous sycophants have never hidden their anger at some
of Atatürk’s more memorable reforms, many of which were designed to limit the
role of religion and make sure Turkey became and remained a western-oriented secular republic. The AKP deeply resents
not only that orientation but also the military, economic and bureaucratic
elite that grew up around it. This elite rigidly enforced its interpretation of
Atatürk’s reforms and created the hagiography that surrounds the man.
AKP
spokesmen would have us believe all this reduction of Atatürk’s place in
Turkish society is being done in the name of increasing ‘democracy’, giving
voice to a large segment of the population that felt denigrated for decades. It
would be nice if Erdoğan had used this opportunity to bring real democracy to
Turkey. But unfortunately, the AKP version of democracy seems merely to replace
one rigid dogma with another, to assume that winning an election gives the
right to ignore any other opinion. Once it was the word according to Atatürk.
Now it is the word, the new reality, according to Tayyip Erdoğan. No criticism
shall be tolerated. Democracy that anyone outside of Erdoğan’s narrow circle of
advisers would recognize as such must wait for another day.